The final two paragraphs from the latest post from Paul Spudis’s blog regarding speculation that the next launch by China, Chang’E 3, will deliver a rover to the moon:
In any event, what does it say about American leadership in space that so many prefer to put their heads in the sand and ignore or deny this disquieting series of developments? It does not require either imminent or distant hostilities to recognize the possible dangers of having one power dominate such a vital field of endeavor – particularly a political power with a mixed record of sympathies to the western values of democracy and economic freedom.
Going to the Moon and developing cislunar space may not seem to be very important to some – it clearly isn’t to the current leadership of NASA. Prior to October 4, 1957, orbiting a satellite around the Earth wasn’t seen as very important either.
Part 2: Disney and the Resources Based View
Part 3: DARPA, Kodak, and Wiring Innovation
Part 4: The FBI and Transformational Change
Part 5: Veridian and the Role of Reputation and Culture
Part 6: Walmart in China and CAGE Differences
Part 7: Apple and Counteracting the Forces of Technological Obsolescence